From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AD79A3858C5E; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 07:30:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AD79A3858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1678779056;
	bh=xUL1vvs2U1fxVSi7oTTF5aGk94UWS4G1Qk6DojhyB60=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Pb6TEFvimeofzlKhJv6OQoyMIlPkarmAjvMAk+GZQtHge7yOkUOrclGr161sK5ReP
	 PYyTHnJzi2OUeD1A/5nq/EDajIlE6xwcXu8Ek01KfaVJb7OdEQDtH9DICepTCYi8dV
	 ou9s9xQmTHAWa23oQfrlQvwDjZk5ofjxWKVmpn3U=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109109] [13 Regression] mariadb fails in tests on i586
 (non-LTO mode) after r13-4435-g2c089640279614e3
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 07:30:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109109-4-l5tVkceVTx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109109-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109109

--- Comment #11 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Weird, at least on the current trunk when reverting all 4 i386.md hunks v=
s.
> all but the 3_3 one I see differences in both
> _Z22trx_undo_get_first_recRK11fil_space_tjtjRPK11buf_block_tP5mtr_tP7dber=
r_t
> and
> _ZL18trx_undo_free_pageP10trx_rseg_tbjjP5mtr_tP7dberr_t
> So, are you sure it is the latter that matters?

Pretty sure as I copied assembly content from good.s for
_Z22trx_undo_get_first_recRK11fil_space_tjtjRPK11buf_block_tP5mtr_tP7dberr_t
function. I'm going to step the function in gdb for good and bad version ri=
ght
now.=