From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 36EEC3858D33; Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:43 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 36EEC3858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678813423; bh=4bCDwCcS0jFkN5eTrC4uKBUFQrs6aFVnxLUfPq8kRYY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=QBG9Toxt8WNp2UPYxWJBfb4nHgMcMiLec91M/Hxjo0kpZ8fd0aAh5AkQ+hTtN0xy0 UFVPLWTyJymE8aUco4OrWJfjiC062bKqsJ6NHQYz7zd+V5Sd6vDE6jRJBjNUaHiQ7n vClXFD3nX0GJqeG3IFohSJNMzq/Irikjo8clYNyA= From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/109130] New: 464.h264ref regressed by 6.5% on a Neoverse-N1 CPU with PGO, LTO, -Ofast and -march=native Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:03:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc blocked target_milestone cf_gcchost cf_gcctarget Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109130 Bug ID: 109130 Summary: 464.h264ref regressed by 6.5% on a Neoverse-N1 CPU with PGO, LTO, -Ofast and -march=3Dnative Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org CC: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks: 26163 Target Milestone: --- Host: aarch64-suse-linux Target: aarch64-suse-linux LNT shows what looks like a clear recent 6.5% regression on the 464.h264ref benchmark from SPEC 2006 CPU suite when compiled with PGO, LTO, -Ofast and -march=3Dnative on a Neoverse-N1 CPU: https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=3D586.220.0 In the same time period, I cannot (immediately) see any similar regressions on any other CPU (all others that we monitor are x86_64) or option combination. Unfortunately I don't have the time and resources to further investigate, but the commit range bad177e848787258..2fc55f51f9953b45 includes 8e26ac4749c (AArch64: Fix codegen regressions around tbz), among other things. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26163 [Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95= )=