public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109150] std::fill should use __gnu_cxx::__is_scalar overloads for all scalars Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 16:07:37 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-109150-4-YsiyKxkIKa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-109150-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109150 --- Comment #8 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely <redi@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3743181899c5490a94c4dbde56a69ab77a40f11 commit r15-1549-gb3743181899c5490a94c4dbde56a69ab77a40f11 Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> Date: Wed Jun 19 16:14:56 2024 +0100 libstdc++: Fix std::fill and std::fill_n optimizations [PR109150] As noted in the PR, the optimization used for scalar types in std::fill and std::fill_n is non-conforming, because it doesn't consider that assigning a scalar type might have non-trivial side effects which are affected by the optimization. By changing the condition under which the optimization is done we ensure it's only performed when safe to do so, and we also enable it for additional types, which was the original subject of the PR. Instead of two overloads using __enable_if<__is_scalar<T>::__value, R> we can combine them into one and create a local variable which is either a local copy of __value or another reference to it, depending on whether the optimization is allowed. This removes a use of std::__is_scalar, which is a step towards fixing PR 115497 by removing std::__is_pointer from <bits/cpp_type_traits.h> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/109150 * include/bits/stl_algobase.h (__fill_a1): Combine the !__is_scalar and __is_scalar overloads into one and rewrite the condition used to decide whether to perform the load outside the loop. * testsuite/25_algorithms/fill/109150.cc: New test. * testsuite/25_algorithms/fill_n/109150.cc: New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-21 16:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-03-15 20:49 [Bug libstdc++/109150] New: " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-15 20:54 ` [Bug libstdc++/109150] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-19 14:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-19 15:11 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-19 15:31 ` arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com 2024-06-19 15:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-19 15:48 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-20 15:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-21 16:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-06-21 16:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-109150-4-YsiyKxkIKa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).