From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D3D1A3858C50; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:34:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D3D1A3858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1682447676;
	bh=/d4TTeo74FQeqS0se1vGcFj7hKhnh7n1KzCJ7tw1dUg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=rJDFA1y+lSOzbs4fkeUngu0eWMvCW4li+HNZSKomEGhysDx2eyFeasdjSg5Dttnx7
	 OlY/4S3RD3tZiDgCbcWIAqhrDQKe8pTUfrtnCk8Lh8PYaGzljgr/mQGDrG6YgTgy1k
	 9n2p+4i5tmOC/t3ZtQO/sAswoof2Vt+OKnDCEyV4=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109154] [13/14 regression] jump threading
 de-optimizes nested floating point comparisons
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:34:36 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109154-4-JEEX2AdihR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109154-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109154-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109154

--- Comment #55 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
If you could do it, that would be great.  I'm now working on frange libm
functions and will need to switch to OpenMP work soon.=