From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AFCA63858C50; Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:32:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AFCA63858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1682447521; bh=3z9dQ+5eGMkCv0wZb6fGwQhi3KbiFmFPpihLNhYKt9g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SgA9/4uGXScE0wRts/4GjzvseXrlMaKr76K9k2J5Ue7BLHvJgKjqWlq0F6LK2bixH I61STVqIqIfjaNkkbrjSStWaroTTo9FDsSyOE9xK/b7AC0OKUIekl5WQb8XWnRlBPf 6NCJgnrHNshmdOWS/fRiOFlKobb0S78o0S8emxIc= From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109154] [13/14 regression] jump threading de-optimizes nested floating point comparisons Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 18:32:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109154 --- Comment #54 from Tamar Christina --- @Jakub, just to check to avoid doing duplicate work, did you intend to do t= he remaining ifcvt changes or should we?=