From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3233E3858C54; Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:21:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3233E3858C54
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679106064;
	bh=9VamZDQLzM5k7qnGqW8RuCzA1/LIl9L5veB5vGfOO0k=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YnBrbP85TbE7DO5zXrmGwVws6K2KNKkxolt4mk1TsG+buQ9h/YX4O7pVVWGa8Tdbp
	 eQGEVD0dAtAlFteZzFET0i6GiJoubhmiN6c6Z7eB5HZO7xZuIJqWoZ4LvgnHklUnHg
	 iJVZXiCcD9Szj2EwRSn/e3l6gIkRqfhuayoXJvMs=
From: "steve_green at qq dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109169] Feature request: Allow omitted template prompts
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2023 02:21:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: steve_green at qq dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109169-4-vJYAkcUuwV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109169-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109169-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109169

--- Comment #14 from steve02081504 <steve_green at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> See http://womble.decadent.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#disambiguation al=
so
> to better understand the reason why GCC implements it this way and why it=
 is
> hard to implement this "extension" in all cases.

But I guess type_info<T>.some_class_name a; is not allowed, right?
Only in the case of decltype(type_info<T>)::name do we need to consider whe=
ther
this is a typename or a template, and in the case of type_info<T>.name this
should always be a template?=