From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3DDCD385B523; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 15:13:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3DDCD385B523
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679066021;
	bh=Swiy0g2SR4xU+ocGTwo6NSBMWdL96u30LROYN3thuvo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=b4pCOi4tA2vVcI5M6j9DYURe8yio454wKY9fdvsdWnuoVw5pTpt/T4Bf21ECyi46B
	 7mLKc3OLIiFIcBp50V4MwuXAuRu4++lxgWCrtDa6+VMy7owOff4xlK7wnqMRcflDg/
	 9jK1AY7ft6lKDI0xqCg2t42skCcRA2WqrZCHc9U0=
From: "steve_green at qq dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109169] Feature request: Allow omitted template prompts
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 15:13:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: steve_green at qq dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-109169-4-xVfbwaD9pZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109169-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109169-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109169

--- Comment #6 from steve02081504 <steve_green at qq dot com> ---
Created attachment 54696
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D54696&action=3Dedit
temp.cpp

(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> You provide a full example of what you want?
> Because right now your example your provided does not even compile with m=
svc.

Strangely enough, when I tried to reproduce this requirement, I found that =
the
sample code I had written would compile.
```c++
#include <concepts>
template<class T>
struct A {
        template<class U>
        static constexpr bool a =3D ::std::is_base_of_v<T, U>;
};
template<class T>
A<T> a{};
int      main() {
        return a<int>.a<int>;
}
```
I had no choice but to attach the files I couldn't get to compile and pass =
in
the attachment.
I didn't understand whether gcc could compile such things or not......=