From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8CC7A3858CDA; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 22:56:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8CC7A3858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679093814;
	bh=rCdUf5rvgd/OwK6Z/Iuh5Ny/JCoxKETMyKoPYA8XkCY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DLMNQdH+sBmpEFYhidrnHq9TBCD4xPwAdr8Xy4bo4RTeMil52gsqJvHETv9c3gvUP
	 he3fPklzwkjLUu8f19dsb9/Ubfo6Pj0I87CeWiN9p6dyZ7PBDsBMVGj1yi2RuutwDr
	 paVxvFj9IVQG++KFNeUXBMuA1YYwyZ0IsBlA6YwQ=
From: "urbanjost at comcast dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109171] initialization using %re causes segfault, as an
 assignment does not
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 22:56:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: urbanjost at comcast dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109171-4-kp5QaQaCis@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109171-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109171-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109171

--- Comment #4 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
 Try that again.  101047.  Not sure what happened to the paste buffer to get
that other number.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D101047=