From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 16AA43858C66; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:41:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 16AA43858C66 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679395294; bh=7rSVcPrp7goTHApnldo7hPq3oIPBh3XYvcvj7xFeAyQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NZ9mbR+lVZzsu4yCsqXGlFKVH1CzeWMc7JOz2krobbPCTvlLqtNeSrnV0Bn7FfQXU rYELa7Vo+TGHPpLcyEBoUAL1XUdRb9iPqdTWX2JlcgtNII7Y+ZtJvLMx/vau5FY7th u+jCmDMOt7fVmGHE3IjFHV4/Av4aoeOFnSbjfiZo= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109176] [13 Regression] internal compiler error: in to_constant, at poly-int.h:504 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:41:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109176 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Oh, and one more thing, why the second hunk isn't inside of the if (assign = && ) body, but after it? If we haven't updated code, then it will never succeed with code =3D SSA_NA= ME unless the first hunk already returned true.=