From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 703F53858D32; Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:13:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 703F53858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679217231;
	bh=N9gLoSGrOiot/3C8k2NJnZw2PW+SzRLgnOuBlpy1TPw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=LSZtXiCY2B3OmPk5qassN1HcS47uXHm394aCQa7nIJ1YT2GxLYQnnITGpd4tV6w57
	 t7i0vJsFKUHtv4S3AgV057dWoJ0mvG9/UAREsqkG1A1+z3kEJaHMyJOvVxrHl3BHbT
	 5MQkDSej03j2ZX/BaI+N/sSftKnVLusyC/fDKT2I=
From: "jdx at o2 dot pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/109189] Format string warnings in
 gcc/config/h8300/h8300.cc under MigW-W64/MSYS2
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 09:13:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: internal-improvement
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jdx at o2 dot pl
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109189-4-09GDJpn0r8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109189-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109189-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109189

--- Comment #1 from Jan Dubiec <jdx at o2 dot pl> ---
BTW, it would be nice if someone experienced could inspect lines 1547=E2=80=
=931553,
1572=E2=80=931578 and 1751=E2=80=931757 in that file. These ranges contain =
code which looks
like this:

        case CONST_DOUBLE:
          {
            long val;
            REAL_VALUE_TO_TARGET_SINGLE (*CONST_DOUBLE_REAL_VALUE (x), val);
            fprintf (file, "#%ld", ((val >> 16) & 0xffff));
            break;
          }

They seem kinda suspicious to me.=