From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9594B3858C74; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:07:41 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9594B3858C74 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679357261; bh=k+Ur4TCzaKgRyBg8L2bJxJh80Wiph9E4UoTFWZliy7o=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mdwe9LuDrqW9y3n6A/21VlA+unpzkogk+8oVLF0RHJ4vZgU3bIw0BsY1LM2z+CT5p XK0F2AggeEaksgfFDvR8WfzcZXeGUKpKKOBxzXxvr9D1qies0gIq16AW9HKI1FGHRf ggzEGJuSjTKN62BUeNygOhajtk8WdfAPYKPvRN0c= From: "de34 at live dot cn" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109203] sort(zip(v1, v2)) fails to compile Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:07:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: de34 at live dot cn X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109203 Jiang An changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #6 from Jiang An --- libstdc++ has (unfortunately?) implemented the tuple-or-pair strategy in P2= 321. The strategy is dropped by P2165. It seems that if std::tuple is unconditionally used, this issue will be resolved. This issue will also be resolved once LWG3865 gets implemented.=