From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B89CB385842E; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:20:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B89CB385842E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679332846;
	bh=z/6A2TN9RFurOSh7L7eKDIwnv4hG2XiMPHyNpkT/Rt4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hh0U9iPA3soRYr3X7Goivv2RBYqE1o4dlurYuFLcMmCrYpJShJPc0U/yCCpNr84lu
	 CPQ0DDCEAAKBiiFTClUnVYmc2eUEV1qMO8lR0DJY3ePWtqMQE1O6fUu9K/wghwIIw1
	 NsKyMsRgDE/LgkRISMRoMaU/buBxdZ+7Y40u+d6s=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyB0cmVlLW9wdGltaXphdGlvbi8xMDkyMTVdIFsxMyBSZWdy?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ZXNzaW9uXSB3cm9uZyB3YXJuaW5nOiBhcnJheSBzdWJzY3JpcHQgMCBpcyBv?=
 =?UTF-8?B?dXRzaWRlIHRoZSBib3VuZHMgb2YgYW4gaW50ZXJpb3IgemVyby1sZW5ndGgg?=
 =?UTF-8?B?YXJyYXkg4oCYc3RydWN0IGxvY2tfY2xhc3Nfa2V5WzNd4oCZ?=
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 17:20:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109215-4-StRdJIpSlO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109215-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109215-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109215

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Slightly simplified -O2 -Wall:
struct S {};
struct T { struct S s[3]; struct S t; };
void bar (struct S *);

void
foo (struct T *t)
{
  for (int i =3D 0; i < 3; i++)
    bar (&t->s[i]);
}
On:
void
baz (struct T *t)
{
  for (int i =3D 0; i < 4; i++)
    bar (&t->s[i]);
}
we on the other side don't warn iN GCC 12 even when we probably should:
fre3 in that case replaces:
  _10 =3D &t_5(D)->s[0];
  bar (_10);
  _15 =3D &t_5(D)->s[1];
  bar (_15);
  _20 =3D &t_5(D)->s[2];
  bar (_20);
  _25 =3D &t_5(D)->s[3];
  bar (_25);
with
  _10 =3D &t_5(D)->s[0];
  bar (_10);
  bar (_10);
  bar (_10);
  bar (_10);
and the warning is only in vrp1.
void
qux (struct T *t)
{
  bar (&t->s[2]);
}

void
corge (struct T *t)
{
  bar (&t->s[3]);
}
are then even simpler cases.  r13-4521 and later warns for all those, GCC 12
for none of those.=