From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 18BC43858C62; Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:59:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 18BC43858C62 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679414367; bh=0xO3WUXqr3ApHuUcSGyC734vMhcWyoxzFgglgrDjz3g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wkf0J24smOxKdz8nWLIRe7KOKMpuhQ0SmGHr0yf+h7qp8GRczRpCBQGrWKIhbLmcO 5O+dZqsWBVnpuXyJSu0xn3nt7UeiJNTZ270y41j/bLvYcYX1QViMct/ddxNyR9QLJe 4QJFK/sCLEn0svRmYA30K3Jw0tlJNB8uqkn5rCaI= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109230] [13 Regression] Maybe wrong code for opus package on aarch64 since r13-4122-g1bc7efa948f751 Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:59:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109230 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- So are we talking about typedef float V __attribute__((vector_size (16))); typedef int VI __attribute__((vector_size (16))); V foo (V x, V y) { V a =3D x - y; V b =3D y + x; return __builtin_shuffle (b, a, (VI) { 0, 5, 2, 3 }); } then?=