public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug d/109231] [13 regression] Comparison failure in libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.o
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:02:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109231-4-ciQH2h7McV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109231-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Can you find out the gdc and d21 invocation lines for those 2 cases?
I've tried to test it using a cross-compiler:
/usr/src/gcc/objs4/gcc/d21 ../../../../libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.d
-quiet -dumpdir rt/util/.libs/ -dumpbase typeinfo.d -dumpbase-ext .d -g -O2
-Wall -version -fchecking=1 -fversion=Shared -frelease -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections -fpreview=dip1000 -fpreview=fieldwise -fpreview=dtorfields
-fPIC -fversion=Shared -iprefix
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/gcc/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.1/ -isystem
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/./gcc/include -isystem
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/./gcc/include-fixed -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -I ../../../../libphobos/libdruntime
-I . -v -o /tmp/typeinfo.s1
/usr/src/gcc/objs4/gcc/d21 ../../../../libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.d
-quiet -dumpdir rt/util/.libs/ -dumpbase typeinfo.d -dumpbase-ext .d -g -O2
-Wall -version -fno-checking -fversion=Shared -frelease -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections -fpreview=dip1000 -fpreview=fieldwise -fpreview=dtorfields
-fPIC -fversion=Shared -iprefix
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/gcc/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.1/ -isystem
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/./gcc/include -isystem
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/./gcc/include-fixed -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -I ../../../../libphobos/libdruntime
-I . -v -o /tmp/typeinfo.s2
/usr/src/gcc/objs4/gcc/d21 ../../../../libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.d
-quiet -dumpdir rt/util/.libs/ -dumpbase typeinfo.d -dumpbase-ext .d -O2 -Wall
-version -fno-checking -fversion=Shared -frelease -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections -fpreview=dip1000 -fpreview=fieldwise -fpreview=dtorfields
-fPIC -fversion=Shared -iprefix
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/gcc/../lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.1/ -isystem
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/./gcc/include -isystem
/home/jakub/src/gcc/obj62/./gcc/include-fixed -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/sys-include -I ../../../../libphobos/libdruntime
-I . -v -o /tmp/typeinfo.s3
but don't see assembly differences in any of that. objs4/gcc/d21 is
../configure --target sparc-sun-solaris2.12 (but I'm playing with stuff in
x86_64-linux libdruntime tree because I have no idea what all d21 needs...).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-21 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-21 12:42 [Bug d/109231] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 12:42 ` [Bug d/109231] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 12:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 12:58 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-21 14:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-03-21 14:36 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-21 15:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 15:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 15:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 16:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-22 6:51 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-22 13:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 14:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 16:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 17:03 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-22 21:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 12:18 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-23 12:28 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-23 12:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-24 12:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-24 13:08 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29 8:53 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-29 15:00 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29 15:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-29 15:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 13:30 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-30 13:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 16:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 18:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 7:57 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-31 7:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 9:22 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-31 9:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 12:15 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-31 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-17 15:14 ` [Bug d/109231] [13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-14 12:29 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-109231-4-ciQH2h7McV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).