[Bug d/109231] [13 regression] Comparison failure in libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.o

public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug d/109231] [13 regression] Comparison failure in libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.o
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 14:36:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109231-4-pdDIvUnxZ9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109231-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231

--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
"jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109231
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Can you find out the gdc and d21 invocation lines for those 2 cases?

sure (with -v -save-temps added):

* stage 2, -fno-checking:

/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/gdc
-B/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/
-B/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/bin/ -B/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/lib/
-isystem /vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/include -isystem
/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sys-include -fno-checking -fversion=Shared -Wall
-frelease -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O2 -g -fpreview=dip1000
-fpreview=fieldwise -fpreview=dtorfields -nostdinc -I
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime -I . -c
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.d -v
-save-temps  -fPIC -fversion=Shared -o rt/util/.libs/typeinfo.o

/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/d21
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.d -quiet
-dumpdir rt/util/.libs/ -dumpbase typeinfo.d -dumpbase-ext .d -mcpu=v9 -g -O2
-Wall -version -fno-checking -fversion=Shared -frelease -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections -fpreview=dip1000 -fpreview=fieldwise -fpreview=dtorfields
-fPIC -fversion=Shared -iprefix
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/gcc/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/13.0.1/
-isystem /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/include -isystem
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/include-fixed -nostdinc
-isystem /vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/include -isystem
/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sys-include -I
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime -I . -v -o
rt/util/.libs/typeinfo.s

* stage 3, -fchecking=1

/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/gdc
-B/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/
-B/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/bin/ -B/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/lib/
-isystem /vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/include -isystem
/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sys-include -fchecking=1 -fversion=Shared -Wall
-frelease -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -O2 -g -fpreview=dip1000
-fpreview=fieldwise -fpreview=dtorfields -nostdinc -I
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime -I . -c
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.d  -fPIC
-fversion=Shared -o rt/util/typeinfo.o -v -save-temps

/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/d21
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime/rt/util/typeinfo.d -quiet
-dumpdir rt/util/ -dumpbase typeinfo.d -dumpbase-ext .d -mcpu=v9 -g -O2 -Wall
-version -fchecking=1 -fversion=Shared -frelease -ffunction-sections
-fdata-sections -fpreview=dip1000 -fpreview=fieldwise -fpreview=dtorfields
-fPIC -fversion=Shared -iprefix
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/gcc/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/13.0.1/
-isystem /var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/include -isystem
/var/gcc/regression/master/11.4-gcc-gas/build/./gcc/include-fixed -nostdinc
-isystem /vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/include -isystem
/vol/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sys-include -I
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/libphobos/libdruntime -I . -v -o rt/util/typeinfo.

> I've tried to test it using a cross-compiler:

It might be that this is hard to reproduce in a cross: as I mentioned,
the failure only happens with gas natively and I'm uncertain if the
configure tests distinguishing those two all work properly in a cross.

FWIW, I'm currently running a reghunt to identify the culprit.  However,
a single step takes 1h25...

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-21 12:42 [Bug d/109231] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 12:42 ` [Bug d/109231] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 12:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 12:58 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-21 14:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 14:36 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE [this message]
2023-03-21 15:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 15:18 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 15:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-21 16:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-22  6:51 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-22 13:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 14:01 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 16:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 16:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-22 17:03 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-22 21:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23  9:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-23 12:18 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-23 12:28 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-23 12:32 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-24 12:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-24 13:08 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29  8:53 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-29 15:00 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29 15:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-29 15:11 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-29 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 13:30 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-30 13:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 16:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 18:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31  7:57 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-31  7:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31  9:22 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-31  9:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 12:15 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2023-03-31 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-17 15:14 ` [Bug d/109231] [13/14 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-06-14 12:29 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109231-4-pdDIvUnxZ9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).