From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6DB9C385B516; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:41:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6DB9C385B516
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679564494;
	bh=5IVLVq4EjrNWHYn2y1sY5tJE01VjDFQ6Rk7EpLHDWy0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Wsn8QyFLxM9L0ep0tg8ICS765e04T66tjtxGbzNpPoaP/ooJ5L5e3hgHfFtbR1Q2a
	 4qh9XpVd+H9WlutmEEC0oIpmGIPytudaPZ5npJ8oFSE+NEGK5isaD837aU4bayOtr+
	 ATgqs01BF9yHQV3EJfxaOq2PAjNDy7LsFvPWIHmE=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109247] [13 Regression] optional<T> o; o = {x}; wants to
 use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:41:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109247-4-P7tCkgjJaA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109247

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Slightly more reduced:
template <typename T>
struct optional {
  template <typename U> explicit optional (U);
  template <typename U =3D T> void operator=3D (U);
};
struct T { int a; };
struct S
{
  void foo (int y) { x =3D { y }; }
  optional<T> x;
};=