From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DB5333858C50; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 20:03:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DB5333858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679601792;
	bh=sxSKABmkBwfeDKer1tAEfLfGFM2n9xhl47FD+UxCIeY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Bp1V2ZiLd+titY8+qd8G53bor9fTw42cXdm2oAV+lIjwxEcu0ZZvvo0JQJO8HoJAN
	 tPDliumJ8eDYO/Ha4+2PghY04JXlYQBg41SWWILhp2bxVO1rvptJPO56gcT5I0b01M
	 kvfAQNmY/40/UU9wVYANLg2eaZ7Lyi4oO8uvcqwA=
From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109247] [13 Regression] optional<T> o; o = {x}; wants to
 use explicit optional(U) constructor since r13-6765-ga226590fefb35ed6
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 20:03:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-109247-4-YqtZrT1d46@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109247-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109247

--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 54739
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D54739&action=3Dedit
possible patch

An implementation of my guess at the clang rule, if we end up wanting to go
that way.=