From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8835C3858D35; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 22:15:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8835C3858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679696113; bh=uBUubjgfQEzGNO2DbZCkbM9rAGjFR9Wc8RVYtsShiw4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wlxGx5bKhSBNa963ZzsEdbC0V6priSgCsO4rfwKt7jrkDsmMxO/+PyOuAr8c5M6s9 K8Q3Sx8H2g0CO9n6BC8sUHM8jYSJjYRMwX4fIpDb/xMKD1e/XvCuZB4K68TqxAVagJ C8XO8vCkhU/jUHasbKVvFs5xyJ2DC9mIKoDfrgA8= From: "vineet.gupta at linux dot dev" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/109279] [13 Regression] RISC-V: complex constants synthesized vs. fetching from constant pool Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 22:15:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: vineet.gupta at linux dot dev X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109279 --- Comment #4 from Vineet Gupta --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > If this was about -Os, then I would say yes this is a big code bloat but > this is about -O2. But this is not so much about code bloat, we see 3.5% additional dynamic ic= ount on qemu which will affect perf even if we didn't care about code size at al= l.=