From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6D7A13858D1E; Sun, 16 Apr 2023 20:43:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D7A13858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681677801;
	bh=7znftxekBFE7Q/qOK8QtQBS4GSnbP0f1zujWrdks6dE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GZmz7S6E9gG+TTJW3qeluuWqZap7ePQ30/tTzKSxrdcBWsm0Mz4izhz/JxiwwcbyV
	 BsK80Xb+POHZ+dZnVGd2FljNcY6bNI3NjMAaQvedjebkUgv0o7yk7PQ2vEQ9J/y9Wl
	 nPOxuGWzpyQZtxoogcxp6QOYcJHB+lL4adFq7voU=
From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/109280] Very significant increase in code size (gcc-avr)
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 20:43:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109280-4-wtEwFeJy6V@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109280-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109280-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109280

--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay <gjl at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Could you check against avr-gcc v12.3 just to make sure you didn't hit PR90=
706
(which affects all versiond from v9 to v12.2).=