From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 408C0385828E; Sat,  2 Dec 2023 12:24:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 408C0385828E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1701519852;
	bh=0Z8fhto5NBMI1mQs95dFAQowEv8KQhqZ4knH7a2b3NA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AiQDFgUiHZLIj+iUzdWOpgEOYS+Bfq9TZ/NmyNp/IY0j8i44xbVav69Nh8dcpH2Hf
	 y5pcTjNdmQDpsYG5bJ8Br7FvmWpfR9L9kdWocYjiamYwcTCssuw/yuy0tz0TAaAKnY
	 oJ/T8X+Op/St/OsEDXQmFzzTY2E0h9bicbiPPDMk=
From: "fw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/109289] Conflicting types for built-in functions in
 libgcc/emutls.c
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2023 12:24:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: fw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109289-4-TggMfgUuMN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109289-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109289

--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer <fw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
What I can I do here to help? What's an easy emutls target to build?=