From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2C9E83858C54; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:13:22 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2C9E83858C54
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1679933602;
	bh=cOkwzAGENAFOYL2LIDJCPZiBydNCsjR/OrdUIUwlfSQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=nEAUJszOBPIeActPZUQFSRzKnLqwjjqfAqlD29Y/UU7oKL8aW9rgsHc6W0HgJaFHE
	 lgoaeX7eLT1K4I4dO64p50mhvUC615iHxbvGznZdFTfSyNhxQF9nwXlkMRhlU3Qcun
	 OkBR6FuPPZklAlWf4l3PnzlCOXEwFzC3AVzesur8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/109293] [12/13 Regression] Missing memmem() prototype in
 fixincludes/fixfixes.c on Windows/MinGW-W64
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:13:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109293-4-iFbFJRXQze@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109293

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> I'll make a patch to check if memmem is declared in configure.ac.  memmem=
 is
> not a POSIX function, so it may be undeclared on systems other than MinGW=
 as
> well.

memmem is included in libiberty so it is more just about the prototype not
being declared.=