From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8824F3858C50; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:47:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8824F3858C50 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1679996847; bh=SIHvQrOvKhxPjObUCOLxfE5IIqPkrXWI6gtT12tI+dk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ILYIifTbIxtnvtmWF5FQQU4WP+0nTB6jS0ZbKmrNMyLN+uUcYTr1BQrJe6mIjrRoO tHibkTd1Bg0v1TjV3MLuoA9/1Bn5iiAU1KOO2s+Sx3R95hs/g08Bz391BnZDywxIK0 sCoWfl+Ld/jZZwpMya4KBFCuM78aXCdd4Ri8ruww= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/109299] [12/13 Regression] wrong warning on std::wstring with -O2 -std=c++20 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:47:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109299 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Do we also get better generated code with your above patch? If so, we shou= ld go with it.=