From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4F4D53858CDA; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:10:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4F4D53858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680207024;
	bh=oTS0ob6UAbC2G9o/GzljcdvBr4NlH7qHeYkdz53pC6M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PH9Uke75X/IKQim/PeFfcOksN0wk9Rw3+JVr3S17rfkkFVvQnZ7YmHEEVrj/j4XXq
	 Suw8agC2WUQTf2pNE0bIWSqhfkikffkrCToXJp/hiY8mhx/lz6ZyAn6nX6b1azF435
	 7K9mXra/2iTQymwT/zkhuUHAPQd6crk5vtFlSkVU=
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/109322] -fc-prototypes does not correctly translate
 INTEGER(KIND=C_SIZE_T), and other sizes
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 20:10:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109322-4-zvwcV1CHLe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109322

--- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> =
---
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 07:21:21PM +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>=20
> For ILP32 (32bit x86) and LLP64IL32 (64bit Windows/mingw) targets, it wil=
l use
> c_long_long which is outputted wrong. Anyways I fixed the bug with respec=
t of
> c_long_long being outputted incorrectly as long_long rather than "long lo=
ng"
> too. (r13-6940-ga7df3bea9cf1e4 and backported to GCC 12:
> r12-9370-g429b75db39aa89 ).
>=20

I quite agree that your patch fixed a problem.  My
comment was meant for the OP, who would like to
"integer(c_int64_t) a" translated to "int64_t a;"
That's isn't going to happen anytime soon.  I left
the PR open as an enhancement request.  In 10 years,
if I'm still around I close it.=