From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E242F3858CDB; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:11:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E242F3858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680199907;
	bh=qmb8hnPYgAwjwS1vNmV8kYLP7NbWDAETq2tRdT3N6po=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=twosH6IXa5vVYo/Ex2nsOieSsc7t8OheEUUhkatuVpjQ8OT5ApzSX4HmPJeDcd3t7
	 /NFUvfhGWBbsWD+o8MMzxVRBRWMUIHUgrbb1yotmF2fToiNXzvwguR3EgVtnEwjYUF
	 v5EtjwFdSkIsIDY+EZ8GJVKAns2XpyLNjrBlh0BQ=
From: "enricomaria.dean6elis at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109323] No error when neither of return_value or
 return_void is defined
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 18:11:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: enricomaria.dean6elis at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109323-4-S15LomEk9E@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109323-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109323-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109323

--- Comment #3 from Enrico Maria De Angelis <enricomaria.dean6elis at gmail=
 dot com> ---
However, I'm not entirely sure (not anymore now that I've read the standard
more carefully) that not having any of those two memebrs is an error.=