From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3C1FE3858D39; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:52:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3C1FE3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680040325;
	bh=+Aqqf6K6vXiltuxsSYFCoIk4R3gfcqghKALsBpbfG40=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=RoMplH4qgWNIGTlu/8B3RgAwnvAVPsFm5IEt6TGuumR5aW/o1q44a7UGv93yd1Zhz
	 GK7tIDGBgw9R6u0Fi88ZhV4nyYEVCqS+si6531fDUSiO7/II7J69zx3iRe7PKYh/p7
	 /cQ+SGNSMTs2QqibuwKBrJ9XYFsavH/eag6symQo=
From: "enricomaria.dean6elis at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109323] New: No error when neither of return_value or
 return_void is defined
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:52:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: enricomaria.dean6elis at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-109323-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109323

            Bug ID: 109323
           Summary: No error when neither of return_value or return_void
                    is defined
           Product: gcc
           Version: 12.2.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: enricomaria.dean6elis at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Repro:

1. take the example here ->
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/coroutines
2. remove the 3 `if (cond) co_return;` from `fibonacci_sequence`
3. remove `return_void` from `promise_type`
4. compile

Alternatively: https://godbolt.org/z/v3xd3b7TE, where both GCC and Clang
erroneously accept the code, whereas MSVC correcly rejects it.
(http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct.def.coroutine#6)

I'm aware of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D95517, but that=
 makes
no reference to the fact that not declaring any of the two functions is
erroneous.=