public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109334] tree-object-size: Improve size computation in arguments
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2023 06:48:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109334-4-ZS71cgLfEo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109334-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109334

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Uecker <uecker@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d96757842a13cad3500b74a352ab34d27a8be622

commit r14-4993-gd96757842a13cad3500b74a352ab34d27a8be622
Author: Martin Uecker <uecker@tugraz.at>
Date:   Wed Oct 25 23:24:34 2023 +0200

    tree-optimization/109334: Improve computation for access attribute

    The fix for PR104970 restricted size computations to the case
    where the access attribute was specified explicitly (no VLA).
    It also restricted it to void pointers or elements with constant
    sizes.  The second restriction is enough to fix the original bug.
    Revert the first change to again allow size computations for VLA
    parameters and for VLA parameters together with an explicit access
    attribute.

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            PR tree-optimization/109334
            * tree-object-size.cc (parm_object_size): Allow size
            computation for implicit access attributes.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            PR tree-optimization/109334
            * gcc.dg/builtin-dynamic-object-size-0.c
            (test_parmsz_simple3): Supported again.
            (test_parmsz_external4): New test.
            * gcc.dg/builtin-dynamic-object-size-20.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/pr104970.c: New test.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-29  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-29 11:14 [Bug tree-optimization/109334] New: " siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 22:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/109334] " muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-03-31 12:27 ` siddhesh at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-10-29  6:48 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-10-29  7:29 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-07  7:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109334-4-ZS71cgLfEo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).