From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 141ED3858C50; Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:58:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 141ED3858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680195495;
	bh=HgBujHpOKMd89m7KO12uzkI+Ub/E8BWqsC/H4IX9mAw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ujxIeC4Lw52ummLbMc5xNxnyuriqcpstjndBC0mg6ecjXRvpBuTyCQunbyJ4NTdgc
	 b85GVlAehpyLn6A1vRV8+D5vD1LeB5uyucxJjunOhQYPa4r+WvpsVKeRnNf24QlW3H
	 bVD8qgktayrVh8sRHHLsTaLoOvO92mjggls3d4+A=
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109338] `S<a_concept<int> auto>` isn't valid C++20
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:58:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status see_also resolution
Message-ID: <bug-109338-4-o01IxuvxJ0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109338-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109338-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109338

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
           See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
                   |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96464     |
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I reckon it makes sense to call this a dup of PR96464 even, since we
incorrectly accept with or without the type constraint.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 96464 ***=