public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/109344] feraiseexcept produces incorrect code when optimizations are enabled Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:09:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-109344-4-lA6Z8YMfca@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-109344-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109344 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I get the same result for all of -O0/-O1/-O2, all 3 functions raise both exceptions and that is correct, glibc has removed the inline versions some time ago: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111753.html The bug was on the glibc side: both the /* One example of an invalid operation is 0.0 / 0.0. */ float __f = 0.0; # ifdef __SSE_MATH__ __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %0, %0 " : : "x" (__f)); and float __f = 1.0; float __g = 0.0; # ifdef __SSE_MATH__ __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %1, %0" : : "x" (__f), "x" (__g)); part, because glibc didn't tell the compiler the inline assembly actually modifies the register. So, the first one was supposed to be __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %0, %0 " : "+x" (__f)); and the second __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %1, %0" : "+x" (__f) : "x" (__g)); Not a bug on the GCC side and on glibc side it has been fixed by the removal of the inline version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-30 11:09 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-03-30 7:49 [Bug c++/109344] New: " albin at yahoo dot com 2023-03-30 10:17 ` [Bug c++/109344] " xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-30 11:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2023-03-30 11:21 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-03-30 12:18 ` albin at yahoo dot com 2023-03-30 12:23 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-109344-4-lA6Z8YMfca@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).