public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109344] feraiseexcept produces incorrect code when optimizations are enabled
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 11:09:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109344-4-lA6Z8YMfca@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109344-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109344

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I get the same result for all of -O0/-O1/-O2, all 3 functions raise both
exceptions and that is correct, glibc has removed the inline versions some time
ago:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-March/111753.html

The bug was on the glibc side:
both the
      /* One example of an invalid operation is 0.0 / 0.0.  */
      float __f = 0.0;

# ifdef __SSE_MATH__
      __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %0, %0 " : : "x" (__f));
and
      float __f = 1.0;
      float __g = 0.0;

# ifdef __SSE_MATH__
      __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %1, %0" : : "x" (__f), "x" (__g));
part, because glibc didn't tell the compiler the inline assembly actually
modifies the register.
So, the first one was supposed to be
      __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %0, %0 " : "+x" (__f));
and the second
      __asm__ __volatile__ ("divss %1, %0" : "+x" (__f) : "x" (__g));
Not a bug on the GCC side and on glibc side it has been fixed by the removal of
the inline version.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-30 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-30  7:49 [Bug c++/109344] New: " albin at yahoo dot com
2023-03-30 10:17 ` [Bug c++/109344] " xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 11:09 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-03-30 11:21 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-30 12:18 ` albin at yahoo dot com
2023-03-30 12:23 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109344-4-lA6Z8YMfca@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).