From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7659F3858D20; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 08:15:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7659F3858D20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1680250531; bh=vj84olNF3BOKXR/EMt90oDQKQovhI78sfCy6n+NwF0g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Si58ZGyadIzZToduC2MXht55zsEIgCome9lw9P+70XYhn6d6SkBdxiqYsRQTz1ElM Tkb3lSCQAAnQ4TSiItwR5uaWUw5n1FyVzlBJWch0yithHPF15FwZSJZkQ1xtkm9jjp dZVrWwoMvLLnH3WCPBCWqLToQx2G3dyjmqcmOC34= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109353] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc (test for excess errors) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 08:15:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization, testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109353 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So if it's possible to refactor things as to key the copy size dispatching = on the destination size (that seems to be known here) rather than the source that might help (unless we then diagnose overread from the source in other cases ...)=