From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A5B733858D33; Thu,  6 Apr 2023 22:19:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A5B733858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680819544;
	bh=NtME/pUfVFB/tp9NNfSaURsuDJ3NzlXYP+h6WfqmFR0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=P9D8b3SU6g/N5LF2WQ98Vmhy7Zh2PepBcY0nXsF0DJC1WsH7t7LgrE5U+jIjNEegM
	 gMP/tvq8iRxfzF+i/9xBUjdmcb4pw2MZZda5uL7pTuv3Bp4c9lPPaBTGrEctBDNdHl
	 joDLaPW6xHTnmFIs5zTdoBwAcPW/zIffTbkgnBfg=
From: "jg at jguk dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109356] Enhancement idea to provide clearer missing brace
 line number
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 22:19:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: jg at jguk dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WONTFIX
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109356-4-XhZn12kk0y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109356-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109356-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109356

--- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant <jg at jguk dot org> ---
I see it is more complicated than I imagined. Thank you for looking into it=
.=