public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "baradi09 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/109358] New: Wrong formatting with T-descriptor during stream output Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:49:31 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-109358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109358 Bug ID: 109358 Summary: Wrong formatting with T-descriptor during stream output Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: baradi09 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- This is a very minor bug, but probably easy to fix. It seems, that the T data edit descriptor handling is non-standard conforming when using formatted stream I/O: Given the following MWE: program tabformat implicit none integer :: fd open(newunit=fd, file="test.stream.txt", access="stream", form="formatted") write(fd, "(a)") "1234567890123" write(fd, "(a, t10, a)") "1234", "0123" ! A-descriptor, file positioning allowed write(fd, "(i4, t10, i4.4)") 1234, 0123 ! I-descriptor, file positioning not allowed close(fd) end program tabformat The resulting file contains 1234567890123 1234 0123 # 9 spaces between blocks 1234 0123 # 9 spaces between blocks Apparently, a file positioning takes place during the execution of the write statement. However, if I understand 13.7.1 §1 correctly, file positioning may only happen with the A-descriptor (and it is optional even there). So the standard conforming output would be either (if file positioning happens after the A-descriptor) 1234567890123 1234 0123 # 9 spaces 1234 0123 # 5 spaces or (if no file positioning happens after the A-descriptor) 1234567890123 1234 0123 # 5 spaces 1234 0123 # 5 spaces I personally would prefer latter, and it would be also equivalent to the behavior of the Intel and NAG compilers.
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-31 10:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-03-31 10:49 baradi09 at gmail dot com [this message] 2023-03-31 20:27 ` [Bug fortran/109358] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-06 2:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-06 3:56 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-15 3:31 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-16 8:18 ` baradi09 at gmail dot com 2023-06-02 1:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-06-02 5:17 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2024-02-03 18:28 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-08 18:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-08 18:17 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-12 20:05 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-12 23:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-13 3:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-14 19:58 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-17 20:16 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-02-19 2:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-109358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).