From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C94763858D33; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:40:09 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C94763858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680288009;
	bh=JLQV+DF3f0FLxSOQuYkN30lmhHTlfyeyMz3FPjvdqoU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cSZQqUG4BUD8mhy4S62GHvhp6Bdg44j70WCb1gLmZ4Wd0QrHRBiH9rvaNsVeCCXPb
	 EGik8OMzei4cH+O/jsSykLBqI4DEkDC6Cn4T+1T8I0dkDZWju94hJovdevjpcicoxI
	 nUAjnp0bHyGoUTzcLPXkG9dLWR9Z6Bg++nazRpuU=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109364] Missing return statement in a non void function
 gives only a warning but produces a forced crash.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 18:40:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109364-4-5prJyuRSzI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109364-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109364-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109364

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For GCC 13+, you can use -funreachable-traps which is enabled at -Og at lea=
st.=