public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109364] Missing return statement in a non void function gives only a warning but produces a forced crash.
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 23:24:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109364-4-mM1JRB1sOR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109364-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109364

--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I already explained this on reddit, and it's already explained in PR 43943.

There are programs that are valid and must not give an error.

    int f() { }
    int main() { }

This never calls f() so there is no problem. -Werror=return-type would fail to
compile this valid program.

    int g(bool b) { if (b) return 1; }
    int main() { g(true); }

This program calls g(true) which is OK, it never calls g(false).
-Werror=return-type would fail to compile this valid program.

The C++ standard says these programs must be accepted without errors. What GCC
does is allow you to compile broken code, but it warns, and since GCC 13 it
tries to prevent completely unpredictable undefined behaviour if you
accidentally do fall off the end of a function without returning.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-31 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-31 18:34 [Bug c++/109364] New: " contact at thunderperfectwitchcraft dot org
2023-03-31 18:38 ` [Bug c++/109364] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 18:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 22:17 ` contact at thunderperfectwitchcraft dot org
2023-03-31 22:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 22:21 ` contact at thunderperfectwitchcraft dot org
2023-03-31 22:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 22:46 ` contact at thunderperfectwitchcraft dot org
2023-03-31 22:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 22:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-03-31 23:00 ` contact at thunderperfectwitchcraft dot org
2023-03-31 23:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109364-4-mM1JRB1sOR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).