From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1D6023858D28; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 20:37:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1D6023858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680295074;
	bh=TNL6Vs2k75bT+89eVRYiose06WL6NdCSjBOXA18jVRo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=tj2kJtw/+QeQ5Rr7gqd87qcru5RQrDqTiC8Un6CDSuUDoJr95Hj1yEe4RvrypPDb9
	 eMslA+AVJHzzUts0Xu/UF+3EYQ4y2F5ojRbTMTgKwNR+lz19ImfvPLCFTuAcIvDyXb
	 N/v2hyu1XN8L1XKA35VlNKk3fJqK8aw65NPHVeKg=
From: "priour.be at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/109365] Double delete yields -Wanalyzer-use-after-free
 instead of -Wanalyzer-double-free
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 20:37:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: priour.be at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109365-4-yYSlwsswPv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109365-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109365-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109365

Benjamin Priour <priour.be at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |priour.be at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Priour <priour.be at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> (In reply to Benjamin Priour from comment #0)
> [...]
> > (Note: sorry David, I've binged through bugzilla doc and gcc bugs page =
yet I
> > cannot seem to find the way to add this to the 'analyzer-c++' block, no=
r do
> > I see the option in the advanced fields.)
>=20
> I've added it for you; see the "Blocks: " field of show_bug.cgi

Ahah yes thank you, you sure were fast, I only had time to notice the field
actually appearing only after I submitted the bug, that you had already upd=
ated
it.=