From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3F97D3858C36; Tue, 4 Apr 2023 09:24:10 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3F97D3858C36 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1680600250; bh=dPutZewDkZAVI75B6UK8F6hQOIvB1Qz+hZrWvU4+zFs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CG7SnB43oGfH/lU7EYZ0RpIYF8Ld87r6jR+38N1291cl/rxletSkV+6wjkekZJF+K SJq31WJL5pogH1sXDyGb1PMIDHolzGDmWzB6rP9KS/djnlSISNmG1xxtZwIjTlXjse 6SAqqCs6ZL0a3M6wAbG58eIBQObgC2d69+EtolWE= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/109384] [13 Regression] unquoted keyword 'float' in format [-Werror=format-diag] Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 09:24:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109384 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:840354060e23ff28d325af2b8422233ce14f40f8 commit r13-6997-g840354060e23ff28d325af2b8422233ce14f40f8 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue Apr 4 11:20:28 2023 +0200 riscv: Fix bootstrap [PR109384] The following patch unbreaks riscv bootstrap, where it previously failed on -Werror=3Dformat-diag warning promoted to error. Ok for trunk? Or shall it say e.g. "%<-march=3D%s%>: % extension conflicts with %" ? Or say if the current condition is true, do const char *ext =3D "zfinx"; if (subset_list->lookup ("zdinx")) ext =3D "zdinx"; else if (subset_list->lookup ("zhinx")) ext =3D "zhinx"; else if (subset_list->lookup ("zhinxmin")) ext =3D "zhinxmin"; and "%<-march=3D%s%>: %qs extension conflicts with %", arch, ext ? Or do similar check for which extension to print against it, const char *ext =3D "zfinx"; const char *ext2 =3D "f"; if (subset_list->lookup ("zdinx")) { ext =3D "zdinx"; if (subset_list->lookup ("d")) ext2 =3D "d"; } else if (subset_list->lookup ("zhinx")) { ext =3D "zhinx"; if (subset_list->lookup ("zfh")) ext2 =3D "zfh"; } else if (subset_list->lookup ("zhinxmin")) { ext =3D "zhinxmin"; if (subset_list->lookup ("zfhmin")) ext2 =3D "zfhmin"; } "%<-march=3D%s%>: %qs extension conflicts with %qs", arch, ext, ext2 ? 2023-04-04 Jakub Jelinek PR target/109384 * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc (riscv_subset_list::parse= ): Reword diagnostics about zfinx conflict with f, formatting fixe= s. * gcc.target/riscv/arch-19.c: Expect a different message about zfinx vs. f conflict.=