From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 05BE33858D28; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:16:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05BE33858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681215411;
	bh=4U8YCIrNyO2G4EeC2yQdQ3woVAJt81xWXm+Vv9jUPCE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=t3H/mTPr/+GKLqNeUi/S0Z65jK1grO4oyCIVzuOo2cFhpp9VhqwuZE8nSO0QDSlS4
	 3ot7UUdGuDofHru0uMgeHS51/vuWvIzQ6Fiuggia7hSSaGEch7aOqhpnYdCnrVKxPF
	 COZXGx685KtKrPKA0OxEwon/VgSY+YLIYjV2ej/8=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/109393] Very trivial address calculation does not fold
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:16:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: component bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on
 everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-109393-4-OKqKMp9OwD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109393-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109393

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|tree-optimization           |c
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2023-04-11
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's probably a mismatch of GENERIC/GIMPLE folding.  In this case it's
pointer_int_sum prematurely distributing the multiplication:

/* Return a tree for the sum or difference (RESULTCODE says which)
   of pointer PTROP and integer INTOP.  */

tree=20=20
pointer_int_sum (location_t loc, enum tree_code resultcode,
                 tree ptrop, tree intop, bool complain)
{=20=20=20=20=20
...
  /* If what we are about to multiply by the size of the elements
     contains a constant term, apply distributive law
     and multiply that constant term separately.
     This helps produce common subexpressions.  */

but this kind of stuff shouldn't be done by the frontends these days.

Gating this fixes the issue.  I think this piece of code should be axed
(after careful evaluation of its effect)=