From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8E6DC38582B7; Tue,  4 Apr 2023 16:13:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8E6DC38582B7
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680624781;
	bh=PL2NmIXPO19Gh6Hj3TGgX83Ad8qVbcjzoRM7oGPvs4s=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=hCQ0xQ+F0YXDfCA+vIGaH3CFEz9HWTKPAHOQvNNkquenTFuI9Es3WQJ8ht6+AJN56
	 sviuHDqiVAlekBc0LgvnrIwv0SMAlppmiSpuMU9x/j2eCqwmGIl6xo7Te4wDWsFqTM
	 Ox6Up5LoETPRH/v44negQ3K1NFSnHbWrek8CeROA=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/109411] missing debug information with statement
 frontiers
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:13:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-109411-4-LEiVfrkXTN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109411

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r255569 -- Alex, any comments?

I'm not sure it is a genuine gcc bug but saying "No line 9 in file "test.h""
seems confusing at least.

Possibly related to bug 92468.=