From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EC98A3858D32; Thu,  6 Apr 2023 10:25:50 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EC98A3858D32
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1680776750;
	bh=+npRtHtBdUAzJlYcsi+onwsjYAlKi+pO3E3vPWvORLQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JneEAxEpjlOrYt9M0EnIGZ2FjJpm4bZMTpMJ1IkXB0n6lyWfECQLs5nVbqkvQxlHj
	 iktN+43Of/sA+ZL9Q0Lhalc3jO325e/5z9U9F/8uaWAEtokdfXamwRaE/kIKnWR3Vw
	 1Xq2tAnEwL1+CdQdS/kuWmR6q2ICDMJtEDAmPEVg=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/109426] Gcc runs into Infinite loop
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2023 10:25:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109426-4-PV959NyM7C@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109426-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109426

--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> N.B. this code is just copied from PR 54402. It might have been helpful to
> say where you found the code.
>=20
> zhonghao, it's really not helpful to just copy&paste code that you don't
> understand into bug reports with stupid, incorrect claims like "while
> expanding templates". Maybe you're trying to be helpful, but you're just
> wasting our time.

I'm wondering if this is an attempt for some kind of "academic research" he=
re
like the notorious UMN incident in LKML.=