From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ED5BB3858D1E; Wed, 17 May 2023 17:23:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED5BB3858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1684344209;
	bh=jceltDeA0VnJD0JLqWU0U5y3Wnh8Rnv2y0t+xJKYeFo=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JChnVfQ7CbR/7DEfhCFk5XIH1kaUZ2PrGMUScE9aM+eKMrTVnymOOyWqg6jCmp8wL
	 /M34Nwy6aEfx4KDUxNxMknyRmKuyQTUPhszQVZ4eViUbZw44P7vS9MqDeyD4iO0rpY
	 HWghXlL4ZTeefgc4yrLSKN/EBId4zuZXzS9uqjsQ=
From: "hiraditya at msn dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109441] missed optimization when all elements
 of vector are known
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 17:23:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: hiraditya at msn dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109441-4-ip1BFMnA9y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109441-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109441-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109441

--- Comment #3 from AK <hiraditya at msn dot com> ---
> But IMHO it's academic, right?

yes. i was just messing with vector codegen. But in case all the elements o=
f a
vector/array are same, maybe the loop can be replaced with equivalent
computation?=