public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/109446] Possible destination array overflow without diagnosis in memcpy
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:01:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109446-4-BLW7dxYPuc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109446-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109446
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > > not sure if we should prevent all of those transforms. But the question is
> > > why ASAN doesn't instrument the generated aggregate copy? Maybe because
> > > in C/C++ you cannot write an aggregate array copy?
> >
> > We do instrument those. But only instrument them by checking the first and
> > last byte
> > of the copy, not all bytes in between (because that would be for inline
> > checking too large - we'd need to emit inline a loop over those bytes).
>
> OK, that's lack of an appropriate API then? But still the first and last
> byte should be sufficient to detect the problem (but maybe I'm missing
> something here).
No, because the last byte is out of redzone:
=>0x7ffff5300000: f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00[f3]f3 f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00
the 'f3' redzone is covering 5*8 bytes after the data type only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-07 15:47 [Bug sanitizer/109446] New: " mohamed.selim at dxc dot com
2023-04-11 11:02 ` [Bug sanitizer/109446] " mohamed.selim at dxc dot com
2023-04-11 13:33 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 8:05 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 8:08 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 8:10 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 8:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 8:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 8:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 9:01 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-12 9:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 9:07 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-12 9:18 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2023-04-12 11:16 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-109446-4-BLW7dxYPuc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).