From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DE1503858D28; Sun,  9 Apr 2023 07:58:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE1503858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681027137;
	bh=XVeghfn9jWk82fXi384XwRoOUt7ZN8Z8vjYR5wQYioI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=WK5qQ84HjtJfUJ+FeS+wVY47Vt+i7CkrNvL+ETvXkZ2cEC6ahasVFWxHmpnBitr+h
	 5hskgv2eIlyuLyaGyJKzk0sNhNt6/nwsEn7QNg3UzCWCPkxrhbxuiDZ/To6vv9blRC
	 cxNdhuG7k0lrgC05AL35UcfOSqH1w5LZbNR/6UUw=
From: "muecker at gwdg dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/109450] VLA struct definition vs use in the function
 declaration
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2023 07:58:57 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: muecker at gwdg dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109450-4-PoZYSeuKi9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109450

--- Comment #2 from Martin Uecker <muecker at gwdg dot de> ---
This is unrelated to PR29970. The cause of this is that gimplify_parm_type
recurses into incomplete types which is wrong for the same reason as in
gimplify_type_sizes.=