From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C31E03858D1E; Sun,  9 Apr 2023 02:20:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C31E03858D1E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681006833;
	bh=OG2wuy9viQ37pSOfRb988kAEL3rbvcFfprakDaSJb8w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XtdTiwuZT6zIxpt1sEpffQOTNrZm8yFuxxXDz6UMPuYtFIE68MohpVuvJG8yrTDEY
	 bBFOlQ9d/K46DpS50ZcuvW+L4QOD+kIk3xjj8Y7iuj9lebWLysDbHW3SoBmpHuDJPe
	 74rfNgisJYI3tCSZkJ43IIgbHTv+Z94d2U3SaoSM=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/109450] Wrong code for VLA in struct sithe size expression
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2023 02:20:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-109450-4-fCe14hPbkM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109450-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109450

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code,
                   |                            |wrong-code

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The issue is related to struct foo in the function declaration.

With a slightly modified code you can get an ICE instead:
int bar(int n, struct foo *x)
{
        int a =3D n;
        struct foo { char buf[a++]; }* p =3D x;
        return n =3D=3D a;
}

int main()
{
    return bar(1, 0);
}=