From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5218F3858D32; Fri, 3 Nov 2023 20:06:25 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5218F3858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1699041985; bh=z3ROiQ6kJVqh3yOkYU4EgrjcjVzq8MjS6HbQhqvSHqw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=e0vHbQiMGUF2m0SQ2qv05hom3coBx+lZOPIAxfEyjbVB5pPmZOkTHzluoRjSvNdvI ezRnsJI5X37GSDlbqCEf0zp0XLt6LK3YG+UWBrCnadAbocgjyt/l2YYgZGktzZnjA8 n/KU4rc6WKr0dRvm0iELQP6IbD6/OlbIeQbrdXCY= From: "uecker at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/109450] VLA struct definition vs use in the function declaration Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2023 20:06:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: uecker at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109450 uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |uecker at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|--- |14.0 --- Comment #5 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org --- fixed on trunk.=