From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0B2403858409; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 03:55:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0B2403858409
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681185305;
	bh=jBEJeZL6CwKRiRcFSYkbwQlHMLpMkvRk+2Z2a3qbzmc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=c2jH5pYzEVhyGGvEE/0e1e59eU1T6DT8VJu+Y+Bb+Xzsp1gsW8pzmd47x5u1qVamF
	 obYKDzGDhrJmSIbKRjWjmMoXCe68Cwa3qAiLZE8ykAgZEP/XpKG2iW1JBQtVuYR0HV
	 D/wo9bozorQkRFeqxTUL1umYtWwJv/UASQg8WZ2g=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109464] gcc does not instantiate constructor for explicitly
 instantiated template
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 03:55:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109464-4-9Dvv6DMZC2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109464-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109464-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109464

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #2)
> shouldn't this be classified as wrong code?

It is at least a link-failure. Wrong code might be a strech here.=