public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/109470] unexpected const & behavior
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:36:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-109470-4-NLehkMcLXb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-109470-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109470

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You can use -fsanitize=address to get such bugs diagnosed at runtime:
g++ -fsanitize=address -o /tmp/pr109470{,.C} -g; /tmp/pr109470
=================================================================
==2466554==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope on address
0x7ffe08313d80 at pc 0x000000401304 bp 0x7ffe08313d20 sp 0x7ffe08313d18
READ of size 4 at 0x7ffe08313d80 thread T0
    #0 0x401303 in main /tmp/pr109470.C:17
    #1 0x7f5b06f7958f in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x2958f)
    #2 0x7f5b06f79648 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5
(/lib64/libc.so.6+0x29648)
    #3 0x4010e4 in _start (/tmp/pr109470+0x4010e4)

Address 0x7ffe08313d80 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 64 in frame
    #0 0x4011b5 in main /tmp/pr109470.C:12

  This frame has 2 object(s):
    [48, 52) 'MAX' (line 14)
    [64, 68) '<unknown>' <== Memory access at offset 64 is inside this variable
HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack
unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork
      (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-use-after-scope /tmp/pr109470.C:17 in main
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
  0x10004105a760: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a770: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a780: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a790: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a7a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 04 f2
=>0x10004105a7b0:[f8]f3 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a7c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a7d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a7e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a7f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
  0x10004105a800: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
  Addressable:           00
  Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 
  Heap left redzone:       fa
  Freed heap region:       fd
  Stack left redzone:      f1
  Stack mid redzone:       f2
  Stack right redzone:     f3
  Stack after return:      f5
  Stack use after scope:   f8
  Global redzone:          f9
  Global init order:       f6
  Poisoned by user:        f7
  Container overflow:      fc
  Array cookie:            ac
  Intra object redzone:    bb
  ASan internal:           fe
  Left alloca redzone:     ca
  Right alloca redzone:    cb
==2466554==ABORTING

C++ has always behaved like this and changing it would significantly penalize
all the code in the wild that uses C++ correctly.  There are some exceptions
where the lifetime is extended, but is certainly not one of them.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-11 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-11  7:43 [Bug c++/109470] New: " johannes.kellner at wandelbots dot com
2023-04-11  8:25 ` [Bug c++/109470] " xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-11  8:36 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-11  9:48 ` johannes.kellner at wandelbots dot com
2023-04-11  9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-11  9:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-11 10:23 ` johannes.kellner at wandelbots dot com
2023-04-11 10:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2023-04-11 10:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-109470-4-NLehkMcLXb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).