From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 28B393858D28; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:00:09 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 28B393858D28 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1681286409; bh=1VkOrXw08PAQJRNUZUw2+ifUMU5TcrBtScM59uR/BgM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Mub+kuH7sJyP3EOXFOcH6Bg35EaRRO3UZXb59GzmfzGW6fYx7+F2r3oikeVB7sAXg QK3lejYPjUvQwPmf10EFrUN+nPSHGjLixxtuEFnBdRf4kfEo9dEi5PaCE5S7DU7fEn 6mITa3g1Gm0mJQCjQ3Ci222Qcqv2q+mr4EzCtuOI= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109473] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_gimple failed with -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize since r10-4076-g82e8e335f917b9 Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 08:00:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109473 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot = gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- I will have a look. The following gets rid of undefined behavior and makes= it ICE with -fno-checking as well (but in forwprop then). struct spa_buffer { __UINT32_TYPE__ *metas; }; void do_port_use_buffers(struct spa_buffer **buffers, void *mem) {=20 for (int i =3D 0; i < 128; i++) { void *endptr; for (int j =3D 0; j < 128; j++) endptr =3D (void *)((__UINTPTR_TYPE__)endptr + buffers[i]->metas[j]); if (endptr > mem) return; } }=