From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 58C8B3858D37; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:46:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 58C8B3858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681458374;
	bh=hC3C8KyKRN9Unk5Pfzu9AoPUv2OyUJliGrDV1LCvMlY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GWQ4aooSkjJfHbgV4UAMb45U4wDS0xyRtwSwrtp//o4+dW5/G7KIeEoIkRhYEUMnf
	 LaOP9dBCaxmLraryUrHKglhUwpxMRc24FNrSov6Hq7NKIjfe+Lze2ZKRV4oqMzjnbj
	 CFh+BCv/0bmJ/mIkLsWM99GkaCm/1HmyAvpzANTk=
From: "klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/109476] Missing optimization for 8bit/8bit
 multiplication / regression
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:46:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109476-4-676R2WTNFQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109476

--- Comment #16 from Wilhelm M <klaus.doldinger64 at googlemail dot com> ---
(In reply to Roger Sayle from comment #14)
> My apologies for the delay/issues.  My bootstrap and regression testing of
> this patch (on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) revealed an issue or two (including t=
he
> reported ICE).  My plan was to fix/resolve all these before posting a
> concrete submission to gcc-patches.=20=20

We all appreciate your great effort in this case! Please don't hesitate to =
send
here some patches to test with. I'll be happy to test your patches!=