From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 84E853858D28; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:43:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 84E853858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681314227;
	bh=QvX55vr1cyZcviCxgY3IqwURQHcKhSKbxMJko/oyo6w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=mwUgDMUvNzfmg2kSw60Ie3uj1NQC+19FyXkt0s/Mkzld4G/3324ZSWCfZTMxeuvkT
	 wZ8eP7UoS2EMtxvkBS4l/jTYt5pensgEUQ6QQeR4Rr/wrSqPMKpvwx0V2OTUTVUABD
	 swj+aUOYpeD62BLeLzxLRF4SWeZhBWMALVZWHTDQ=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/109476] Missing optimization for 8bit/8bit
 multiplication / regression
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 15:43:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109476-4-Yz74kz4qet@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109476

--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Correct, this certainly can not be done by combine, it see two independent
pseudos here.  For hard registers it *can* do many tricks, but not for
pseudos like this.=