From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B32D83858C5E; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:24:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B32D83858C5E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681475095;
	bh=/h0plzbPs1Pm6kkp9Jk4E/4I2OQ9422EySp2FueX3nE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KpD/C29BaFTNoFbSt7q60PT2Mtz86bjA161R1LK2V89OWqWpO5wr4Co1JyJTo3XfL
	 3mQbd69FiD5sy63RobCjUso0tG+fWoEXJwfZnhdV6PjiXc4EzoHE/jAwAFeFaOX/Vb
	 o994/oGHbEovPTexBZx1SyeSX05GMWaRqqNFBb3s=
From: "chip.kerchner at ibm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/109491] [11/12 Regression] Segfault in
 tree-ssa-sccvn.cc:expressions_equal_p()
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 12:24:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chip.kerchner at ibm dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-109491-4-KoRc9GzDrZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-109491-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-109491-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109491

--- Comment #14 from Chip Kerchner <chip.kerchner at ibm dot com> ---
Just one more question and then I'll switch to the new bug.

Would it help any if the functions that are "always_inline" be changed from
non-static to static?

Eigen's approach (where this code originally came from - yes, it could be
definite be better) is to use non-static inlined function.=