From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D4C453858D32; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:55:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D4C453858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1681368958; bh=Ahi4EanDCULICAdXv7CGRVxciWExWm0JBpEFrYGD46w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Y6QKel1+bT1CSsZqEE5goEyVD2NWRULVhKd1GBM0uct+jUNtsiyFZssz2+gwtc53J NGO1QVdyHINHvkhvnc7dyAhODFkQRP9EpstgZOA2TeX/vw1JN93F9iD5SJYIuJZ9XJ /s4A53YEWbFwDW4kdIBuNBVtVaWKJ5tOv2FcMwAU= From: "mitskevichmn at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/109493] Broken O2 optimization on s390x in GCC 13 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 06:55:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mitskevichmn at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D109493 --- Comment #5 from Mikhail Mitskevich --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #3) > It's unclear to me from the reports if this started with GCC 13 or if it > always failed on s390x. Could you clarify? Thanks. This test works on GCC 10 and GCC 11 on s390x platform. Now we include Fedo= ra Rawhide with GCC 13 to our test suite, and test starts to fail.=